Jewish Terrorism

Yes, there is, according to Dr. Fahed Fanek, "Jordan's leading economics and media consultant." And here's a prime example:

The New York Times was forced to apologize to its readers for printing a photograph of a pro-Israel rally, which also showed a few anti-Israel demonstrators in the background an unacceptable transgression, it seems, in the land of free speech and press objectivity.

Such overwhelming Jewish domination indeed, terrorism will definitely result in a violent reaction.

Which reaction will, of course, not be in the least motivated by anti-Semitism. The main thrust of this article, you see, is that the all-powerful Jewish lobby in the U.S. has overplayed the anti-Semitism card.

Using the anti-Semitism card, however, is about to lose its effectiveness. It has always been a shabby blackmail of a weapon and is beginning to cause genuine anger and contempt.

I guess we'd better stop talking about it then. Don't want to cause genuine anger or contempt. And there's certainly no possibility that any of us would dare accuse Dr. Fanek of being an anti-Semite, after he was kind enough to warn us.

Yet, it still is an extremely effective weapon in Washington, where no member of Congress from either party dares vote against Israel, despite knowing deep down that their votes were going to support an outlaw state.

Even the president of the United States, the most powerful man on planet Earth, who sees himself as Israel's staunchest friend and ally, trembles with fear of the American Jewish lobby called the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), which can easily set the US media against him.

Gee, the President is trembling, Congress in on its knees and, of course, the media is under complete Jewish domination. But we still can't get the American embassy moved to Jerusalem, where it belongs. Funny.